Press "Enter" to skip to content

Against Absolute Goodness (Oxford Moral Theory) by Richard Kraut

By Richard Kraut

Are there issues we must always price simply because they're, comfortably, solid? if that is so, such issues can be acknowledged to have "absolute goodness." they might be reliable simpliciter or complete cease - no longer strong for somebody, now not solid of a type, yet still sturdy (period). they may even be referred to as "impersonal values." reasons why we should price such issues, if there are any, might simply be the truth that they're, effectively, good stuff. within the 20th century, G. E. Moore was once the good champion of absolute goodness, yet he's not the one thinker who posits the lifestyles and significance of this property.

Against those pals of absolute goodness, Richard Kraut right here builds at the argument he made in What is sweet and Why, demonstrating that goodness isn't a reason-giving estate - actually, there is no such factor. it really is, he holds, an insidious classification of functional inspiration, since it will be and has been used to justify what's damaging and condemn what's worthy. Impersonal price attracts us clear of what's strong for individuals. His approach for opposing absolute goodness is to go looking for domain names of sensible reasoning within which it'd be considered wanted, and this leads him to an exam of a large choice of ethical phenomena: excitement, wisdom, attractiveness, love, cruelty, suicide, destiny generations, bio-diversity, killing in self-defense, and the extinction of our species. Even people, he proposes, shouldn't be stated to have absolute price. The unique value of human existence rests as an alternative at the nice benefits that such lives typically offer.

"When one reads this, one sees the potential for actual philosophical development. If Kraut is correct, i might be unsuitable to claim that this booklet is nice, interval. or perhaps nice, interval. yet i'm going to say that, as a piece of philosophy, and if you happen to learn it, it truly is very good indeed." --Russ Shafer-Landau, collage of Wisconsin-Madison

Show description

Read Online or Download Against Absolute Goodness (Oxford Moral Theory) PDF

Best ethics & morality books

Gerechtigkeit in der Transplantationsmedizin - Sind die Kriterien der Transplantationsmedizin gerecht? (German Edition)

Studienarbeit aus dem Jahr 2006 im Fachbereich Ethik, word: 1,0, Evangelische Hochschule Berlin (Studiengang Pflege / Pflegemanagement), Veranstaltung: Medizin- und Pflegeethik II, 10 Quellen im Literaturverzeichnis, Sprache: Deutsch, summary: Etwas gerecht zu verteilen ist meist mit Überlegungen, oft auch mit Problemen verbunden.

Thomas Aquinas: Happiness, Desire, Virtue: An Interpretation

Essay from the yr 2008 within the topic Ethics, grade: No particular grade, Stockholm (Sankt Sigfrids Prästseminarium), path: Given as a path in ethics for seimarians, 1994, language: English, summary: The problem of ethics in our time demands a synoptic view in a position to kindling convinced teleological motivation, in people and societies.

Das Urteilen (German Edition)

»Das Urteilen« warfare von Hannah Arendt als dritter Teil ihres Werkes »Vom Leben des Geistes« geplant und wurde aus dem Nachlass der Philosophin rekonstruiert. Unter Berufung auf Immanuel Kant weist Arendt dem Urteilen im Leben des Geistes einen spezifischen Platz zu. Mit seiner Hilfe orientiert sich der Mensch in der Welt, schafft er Sinn.

The Viper and the Storm: A Journey of Growth (Walid and the Mysteries of Phil)

During this 3rd quantity of the philosophical experience sequence Walid and the Mysteries of Phi, a sensible personality speaks to each one in every of us while he says to his pals, “We’re all individuals in an exceptional drama that encompasses us in area and time. We’re selected to assist movement it ahead, yet we by no means need to depend upon simply our personal talents to take action.

Additional resources for Against Absolute Goodness (Oxford Moral Theory)

Sample text

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.12 of 5 – based on 5 votes